Go Back   ManagementParadise.com | Management & Business Education Learning Platform Projects HUB for Management Students ( MBA Projects and dissertations / BMS Projects / BBA Projects > PUBLISH / UPLOAD PROJECT OR DOWNLOAD REFERENCE PROJECT

DIVIDEND POLICY

Discuss DIVIDEND POLICY within the PUBLISH / UPLOAD PROJECT OR DOWNLOAD REFERENCE PROJECT forums, part of the Projects HUB for Management Students ( MBA Projects and dissertations / BMS Projects / BBA Projects category; Chapter No. 10 - Dividend policy Contents # Need for dividend policy - balance between dividend payment and retention for ...

Reply

 

Thread Tools Display Modes
DIVIDEND POLICY
Old
 (1 (permalink))
[email protected]
abhaycaya11@yahoo.co.in is on a distinguished road
 
abhaycaya11_yahoo.co.in
Management Paradise Newbie
 
Institute: srknec
Status: Offline
Posts: 101
Join Date: Jan 2010
Wink DIVIDEND POLICY - January 31st, 2010

Chapter No. 10 - Dividend policy
Contents
# Need for dividend policy - balance between dividend payment and retention for growth
# Different kinds of dividend policies - factors influencing dividend policy
# Indian companies declaring dividend - need for cash retention for growth and effective tax rate influencing dividend policy
# Theories on dividend policy
# Determining growth rate based on return on equity
# Equity valuation based on dividend declared and growth rate
# Numerical exercises on equity valuation based on dividend amount and growth rate

At the end of the chapter the student will be able to:
• Calculate the cost of equity through dividend capitalization model
• Determine the value of equity through the same model and
• Find out the growth rate given the return on equity and proportion of retained earnings



Need for dividend policy – balance between dividend payment and retention for growth
As the students know by now “dividend” is paid on share capital. Share capital of both the kinds – equity share capital and preference share capital. However there is a difference in respect to dividend between the two. In chapter no. 4 on “Financial resources”, we have seen this difference. In case of preference shares, the dividend rate is fixed whereas on equity share capital, the dividend rate is not fixed; it can vary depending upon profits for the year and available cash for disbursement of dividend. Hence “dividend policy” omits preference share capital and our discussions will only be concerned with equity share capital.
Can a company distribute its entire profits as dividend? Even if the board of directors wants it that way it is not possible as per provisions of The Companies’ Act. It clearly states that depending upon the percentage of dividend on equity share capital, a certain percentage of profits after tax (PAT) needs to be transferred to General Reserves. Hence 100% of PAT cannot be given away as dividend. Further the company needs funds for future growth. Where is it going to get it from in case it distributes more dividends? It can raise fresh equity from its existing shareholders as well as the market. However there is “public issue” cost to be taken care of.
The students will further recall that we need to plough back profits during the year into business to take care of the following:
• Repayment of medium and long-term obligations
• Contribution towards increase in current assets – a portion of it in the form of Net Working Capital (please see the chapter on “financial statements analysis” under “funds flow” statement
Thus there are three distinct reasons as to why a business enterprise needs to have a balance between dividends paid out to the shareholders and amount retained in business in the form of reserves.
In this context the students may refer to the chapter on “capital structure” in which the difference between the resources of a new unit and an existing unit has been shown. “Retained earnings” are readymade resource available to a business enterprise.

Measures of Dividend Policy
Dividend Payout measures the percentage of earnings that the company pays in dividends
=Dividends/Earnings
Example no. 1
Suppose the PAT of a limited company is Rs. 100 lacs. If it pays Rs. 50 lacs as dividend, the DPO ratio is 50%.
The higher the DPO ratio, the less the retention ratio and vice-versa

Dividend yield measures the return that an investor can make from dividends alone. It is related to the market price for the share.
= Dividends / Stock Price
Example no. 2
The market price of a stock is Rs. 4000/- and the dividend is Rs. 50/-. Then the dividend yield is 1.25%, which is very poor in Indian conditions. Thus while dividend rate for the above stock assuming Rs. 100/- as the face value would be 50%, the dividend yield is just Rs. 1.25%

Different kinds of dividend policies – factors influencing dividend policy
The dividend policy of a limited company is closely linked to its profitability and need for cash for financing future growth. Thus there are definite factors influencing dividend policy in a limited company besides the attitude of the management – a management may be conservative, declaring less dividends and transferring more to reserves while aggressive management will declare more dividends and transfer less to “Reserves and surplus”. Let us examine some of the critical factors influencing “dividend policy” in a limited company.
1. Profitability of operations – If the operations are very profitable there is a strong possibility that the dividend rate is high.
2. If the company is in the growth phase, the % of dividend will be less – any enterprise in its initial stages of business immediately after commencement of commercial operations. Just to recap – any business has three distinct phases in its business, the growth phase, the plateau phase when the % growth is “nil” and the decline phase when the growth is negative. Progressive business houses plan for diversification or any other strategic initiative that will again take it to the growth phase from the plateau phase, although in a different product line.
3. The effective tax rate of the enterprise. Effective tax rate is different from income-tax rate. Income tax rate is 35% + 10% surcharge thereon, making a total of 38.5%. The amount of actual tax paid by the enterprise depends upon the degree of tax planning – in short how much the profit subject to tax is different from the profits shown in the books. “Depreciation” is one of the most important tools in tax planning. The amount of income-tax depreciation will usually be higher than the depreciation in the books (as per The Companies’ Act) so much so the book profit (as shown in the audited annual statements of the company) is higher than the income-tax profit. Companies that pay high tax rate (whose effective tax rate is high), pay up higher dividend than companies whose effective tax rate is low.
4. The expectations of the investors in the market – this is one of the strongest factors influencing dividend policy. Investors are of different kinds. Better known kinds are – those who prefer dividend, those who prefer capital gains, i.e., market appreciation, difference between purchase price and present market price and those who indulge in stocks purely for reasons of speculation. Hence companies do have the compulsion to satisfy the needs of at least a section of investors who look forward to dividends. In fact dividends declared by competitors in the same industry would be a strong factor in the expectations of investors in a company.
5. Cost of borrowing – if the cost of borrowing is less and liquidity in the market is easy, within the debt to equity norms imposed by the lenders, limited companies will like to retain less and give more dividends. Example – Present debt to equity ratio – 1.5:1. This can go up to 2:1. The cost of borrowing is low. Under the circumstances, a limited company will prefer to retain less earnings and give away more dividends.
6. Cost of public issues – if the capital market is active and the cost of raising public issue is not high, limited companies may risk paying high dividends and as and when need arises in future issue further stocks. This has to be weighed with the need of the management to retain its control of the company. If this need is high, it may not issue further stocks, which will dilute its control.
7. The restrictions imposed by lenders, bond trustees, debenture trustees and others on % of dividends declared by a limited company. As a part of loan agreement, debenture trustee agreement or bond trustee agreement, there is a clause that restricts the companies from declaring dividends beyond a specified rate without their written consent.
8. The compulsion to declare dividend to foreign joint venture partners and institutional investors – when you have strategic partners in business including foreign investors, you may be required to declare minimum % of dividend. This is true of institutional investors in India too, who have contributed to the company’s equity. This is more relevant in the case of management of limited companies who left to themselves, will not declare any dividends.
9. Effects of dividend policy on the market value of the firm – in case in the perception of the management, the market value is largely dependent upon the rate of dividend, the management will try to increase the rate of dividend.
Note: It will be apparent to the students that the dividend policy decisions based on above factors can at best be exercises in informed judgement but not decisions that can be quantified precisely. In spite of this, the above factors do contribute to make rational dividend decisions by Finance Managers.

From the factors influencing dividend policy flow the different kinds of dividend policies as under:
1. Stable dividend policy irrespective of profitability – increasing or decreasing. This means that over the years the company declares the same % of dividend on the equity share capital. The rates will neither be too high nor too low – they will be moderate.
2. Stable Dividend payout ratios – Dividend payout ratio is the ratio of dividend payable by a limited company to its Profit After Tax. This could be more or less the same over a period, irrespective of whether the profits are going up or coming down. The assumption here is that there are no drastic changes in the profitability of the organisation, especially when it is on the decrease. It can be visualised by the students that any drastic reduction in profits will result in changes in the DPO.
3. Dividend being stepped up periodically – this is possible in the growth phase of the company. The company can come up with the financial forecast say for the next 10 years and decide to increase the rate of dividend every 5 years or three years or so. This may not be true of companies that have been in existence for a long period of time.
Most observers believe that dividend stability if a desirable attribute as seen by investors in the secondary market before they decide to invest in a stock. If this were to be true, it means that investors prefer more predictable dividends to stocks that pay the same average amount of dividends but in an erratic fashion. This means that the cost of equity will be minimised and stock price maximised if a firm stabilises its dividends as much as possible.
Indian companies declaring dividend – need for cash retention for growth and effective tax rate influencing dividend policy
The following is based on an empirical study made by Mr. Ajay Shah of Indira Gandhi Institute for Development Research in the year 1996. The researcher had studied 1725 companies out of the listed companies in Mumbai Stock Exchange. These firms met the following three criteria:
(a) Had net profits in 1994-95 of more than 1% of sales;
(b) Are in manufacturing and not in finance or trading and
(c) Are a part of the databases of CMIE
The 1725 firms were broken up into two groups, high-tax firms where the average tax rate in 1994-95 was above 10%and the remaining low-tax firms

The findings in these two groups are compiled in the table below.
1993-94 1994-95
Low-tax High-tax Low-tax High-tax
Growth in GFA (%) 18.75 16.66 28.90 20.77
Uses of funds (%)
GFA 65.08 39.03 66.49 44.08
Inventories 3.84 13.68 8.62 14.54
Receivables 17.42 21.54 14.54 22.59
Investments 8.78 13.08 7.20 16.29
Cash 4.88 12.66 3.16 2.49
Dividend payout (%) 18.61 25.65 18.77 22.17
Number of companies 1043 682 1043 682
GFA = Gross Fixed Assets
Summary of observations:
• Low-tax companies have had faster growth of GFA
• They allocated a much larger fraction of their incremental resources into asset formation; around 65% of the incremental resources were directed to GFA addition as compared with around 42% in the case of high-tax companies
• Low-tax companies pay out a smaller fraction of earnings as dividends, as compared with high-tax companies
• Finally, low-tax companies invested a much smaller fraction of their incremental resources into financial markets.
• This evidence is consistent with the view that the low-tax phenomenon is primarily driven by the depreciation which is allowed to be written off in the income-tax at a rate that is higher than the rate in the books.



Theories on dividend policy
Some facts about dividend policy:
• Dividends are sticky – you just cannot afford not to issue them by ignoring the preferences of investors
• Dividends follow earnings – a natural conclusion based on evidence produced in the above table.
There are three different theories:

Theory no. 1 - Dividend irrelevance theory – Miller and Modigliani
Preposition - Dividends do not affect the value of a limited company
Basis:
If a firm’s investment policy (and hence its cash flows) doesn’t change, the value of the firm cannot change with dividend policy. If we ignore personal taxes, investors have to be indifferent to receiving either dividends or capital gains on selling their shares in the market at a value higher than the purchase price.
Underlying assumptions
• There are not tax differences between dividends and capital gains for shares
• If a company pays too much in cash, they can issue new stock with no floatation costs or signalling consequences to replace this cash
• If companies pay too little in dividends, they do not use the excess cash for bad projects or acquisitions but use them only for their existing business
• Investors are rational and dissemination of information is effective
Examination with reference to India
1. Prior to 01-04-2002, there was no tax on dividend in the hands of the shareholders. With effect from 01-04-2002, tax on dividend in the hands of the investors has resumed. Further the capital gains tax on indexed stocks is 10% as against personal tax that would vary from one slab of income to another. Even then it would be prudent to assume that on an average the tax rate would not be less than 20% and hence capital gains tax is less than income-tax
2. No transaction costs – impossible to raise resources without any transaction costs in India especially if the firm were coming out with “Initial Public Offer”. This is true of developed markets in the West too.
3. Although investors are getting to be rational in India and that dissemination of information is improving, there is still much scope for improvement.

Theory no. 2 – Walter’s Theory – Long-term capital gains preferred to dividend, as tax on dividend is higher than long-term capital gains
Preposition – Long-term capital gains are less than tax on dividends. This is true of India at present.
Basis:
The higher the rate of dividend, the less the amount available for retention and growth and vice-versa. Hence the less the value of the firm. The premises for this position is that the market value of the firm is not due to dividends paid but funds retained in business. As such this is logical as growth of the firm occurs due to the funds retained.
Underlying assumptions:
Dividend rate does not influence the market value. Profit retention rate influences the market. The short-term tax on dividends is higher than the long-term capital gains on the shares.
Examination with reference to India:
Please refer to the explanation under “dividend irrelevance” theory of Miller and Modigliani

Relevant issue out of this theory is “growth rate”
Growth rate = (1 – DPO) x Return on equity
Mathematically speaking:
Price for a given share = D + r (E - D)/ ke
ke ke
Where,
P = Market price per share,
D = Dividend per share
E = Earnings per share and
r = Return on equity

Example no. 3
A listed company’s return on equity is 18% and its dividend payout is 50%. The growth rate = (1 - 0.5) x 0.18 = 0.09 x 100 = 9%. This is the growth rate that is expected in dividend amount paid out to the shareholders. In India, at present the long-term capital gains tax is 10% and hence the investors would prefer market appreciation to dividends.
To sum up Walter’s theory on dividend, as dividends have a tax disadvantage, they are bad and increasing dividends will reduce the value of the firm. As a corollary, it is only the retained earnings that give growth to an organisation and contribute to the increase in value of the firm.

Theory no. 3 – Gordon’s model – “ a bird in the hand” theory
Preposition
If stockholders like dividends or dividends operate as a signal of future prospects, dividends are good and increasing dividends will increase the value of the firm.
Basis:
If a limited company has continuous good showing, it will be reflected in the growth of dividends over a period of time. This in turn will turn the sentiments of investors in favour of the firm. More and more demand for the shares of the company in the secondary market will be made. This will increase the market value of the firm. Thus the market value of the firm is dependent upon the dividends declared. Further it is also called “ a bird in the hand” theory as dividend is more certain than the unknown appreciation in market price in the future.
Underlying assumptions:
Tax on dividend will be the same as long-term capital gains tax. Investors have high preference for dividends and they are the prime reason for investment.
Examination with reference to India:
Tax on dividend is more than long-term capital gains. “Dividends” are not the only motivation for investors although it does occupy an important place in the preference of investors. Poor and old investors still prefer dividends.


Mathematically expressing:
As per Gordon’s theory, the cost of equity, ke = (D1/P0) + g. In this equation, D1 = dividend at T1, P0 = market value of the share at T0 and g = growth rate in decimals. We can have variations of this equation and find out any of the four parameters, given the other parameters. The variations are:
To determine growth rate, g = ke – (D1/P0),
To determine P0 = D1/(ke – g) and
To determine D1 = P0 x (ke – g)
Example no. 4
A firm has dividend of Rs. 25/- and growth rate of the company is 5%. If the cost of equity is 18%, what is the price at which the stock would have been purchased?
Applying the formula, P0 = D1/(ke – g), we get 25/0.13 (in decimals) = Rs. 192.31
The balanced viewpoint
If a company has excess cash and few good projects (NPV > 0), returning money to stockholders (by way of dividends or buy backs) is GOOD
If a company does not have excess cash and/or has several good projects (NPV>0), returning money to stockholders (by way of dividends or buy backs) is BAD

Following is the sum and substance of the survey conducted in the US market to find out the management beliefs about dividend policy.
Statement of Management Beliefs Agree No Opinion Disagree
1. A firm's dividend payout ratio affects the price of the stock 61% 33% 6%
2. Dividend payments provide a signalling device of future prospects 52% 41% 7%
3.The market uses dividend announcements as information for assessing firm value. 43% 51% 6%
4.Investors have different perceptions of the relative riskiness of dividends and retained earnings. 56% 42% 2%
5.Investors are basically indifferent with regard to returns from dividends and capital gains. 6% 30% 64%
6. A stockholder is attracted to firms that have dividend policies appropriate to the stockholders' tax environment. 44% 49% 7%
7. Management should be responsive to shareholders' preferences regarding dividends. 41% 49% 10%

Determining growth rate based on return on equity
The students will appreciate that growth in a business enterprise takes place due to exploitation of commercial opportunities that are available. For this, the enterprise needs funds and a part of the funds will have to come from internal generation. Another part will come from external debts. Thus funds retained in business in the form of reserves do create a positive impact on the business and contribute to its growth. The term “growth rate” needs explanation as more than one growth rate can be determined for a business enterprise. Hence the following lines are given.
• Growth rate in market value of the share – this is impossible to predict and hence no use attempting this. However it is generally held that the increase in market value of the share closely follows the increase in book value; increase in book value is a factor of funds retained in business
• Growth rate in book value of the share – this is due to funds retained in business. Hence the formula = Return on Equity x (1-DPO) as already explained in the preceding paragraphs under Walter’s theory

Equity valuation based on dividend declared and growth rate
Please refer to Gordon’s model discussed above. Equity valuation based on this model assumes that the growth rate is constant. The formula P0 = D1/(ke – g) is derived based on this assumption.

Certain issues relating to dividend at present in India
Suppose a firm has excess cash and profitability of operations is quite satisfactory. What are the options before it? In Indian conditions, families own most of the business houses and the temptation is very strong to declare high percentage of dividends. This is true especially of the recent past when recessionary conditions were experienced in most of the conventional industries. Is there an alternative under the conditions? Yes, of course:
You are not certain as to when the recessionary conditions would end and market conditions would be conducive for growth. With comfortable position of cash, “buy back” of equity shares is a very good option. The advantages are:
• You have less number of equity shares on which to declare dividend in future. This saves a lot of cash every year.
• You have less number of shares and hence “Earnings Per Share” goes up. This in turn would improve market value. Market value = EPS x P/E ratio
• Less number of shares in the market available for purchase. Hence chances of increasing the demand for a company’s stocks, thereby increasing its price

The option of “buy back” is especially good under certain conditions. Some of the conditions are:
• The number of shares issued by a limited company is very large and demand is perceptibly less. This is affecting the market value of the share
• Opportunities for growth are limited or negligible and hence investment in fixed assets is not much
• Market conditions are uncertain or recession is on and time for revival cannot be estimated
• Right now cash is available and profitability could be under pressure in foreseeable future
Indian companies have started preferring “buy back” to “bonus issue” of shares as the latter is only going to increase the number of shares for servicing by way of dividend. This will only add to the pressure on profits. In quite a few developed markets, limited companies have “buy back” programmes in preference to “dividend” even. This has not started happening in a big way in India. In fact some of the excellently performing companies abroad do not give dividend – example, Microsoft. It has never declared dividend in its corporate history.

Numerical exercises on equity valuation based on dividend amount and growth rate
1. Examine the dividend policies of Indian companies in different sectors and map the DPO over a period of time. Can you link the dividend policy with the following?
• Growth in fixed assets of the company and opportunity to save tax through depreciation
• Effective tax rate as opposed to corporate tax rate
• High profitability
2. Given the following information about ABC corporation, show the effect of dividend policy on the market price of its shares, using the Walter’s model:
• Cost of equity or “equity capitalisation rate” = 12%
• Earnings per share = Rs. 8
• Assumed return on equity under three different scenarios:
• r = 15%
• r = 10%
• r = 12%
• Assume DPO ratio to be 50%.
3. As per Gordon’s model calculate the stock value of Cranes Limited as per following information:
• Cost of equity = 11% and Earnings per share = Rs. 15 Three different scenarios: r = 12%, r = 11% and r = 10%. Assume DPO ratio to be 40%.
4. Study the “buy back” option being exercised by Indian companies and understand the market compulsions that make them prefer “buy back” option to paying “high dividends”.
5. Are there any companies in India similar to the Microsoft in its approach to dividend pay out?
Advertisements


Last edited by bhautik.kawa; April 12th, 2015 at 08:20 PM..
   
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Re: DIVIDEND POLICY
Old
 (2 (permalink))
rahul_theanimal
rahul_theanimal is an unknown quantity at this point
 
rahul_theanimal
 
Institute: IPU
Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Join Date: Jan 2010
Re: DIVIDEND POLICY - January 31st, 2010

nice work....thanx..................................... .........
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Re: DIVIDEND POLICY
Old
 (3 (permalink))
Chhavi Jain
chhavij is an unknown quantity at this point
 
chhavij
Student of PGDM at JIMS
New Delhi, Delhi
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: New Delhi, Delhi
Re: DIVIDEND POLICY - June 8th, 2011

hiiiiiiiiiiii,
i need a dividend policy of any automobile company (spl.jay bharat maruti)
Plz help me.

Thanx in advance
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Re: DIVIDEND POLICY
Old
 (4 (permalink))
Business Education
Business-education is on a distinguished road
 
Business-education
Student of BMM
Mumbai, Maharashtra
Management Paradise Guru
Status: Offline
Posts: 4,329
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Mumbai, Maharashtra
Re: DIVIDEND POLICY - July 2nd, 2015

It is very difficult to understand unless and until you get the clear idea about the concept. Here is the meaning of dividend policy.

Dividend policy is the set of guidelines a company uses to decide how much of its earnings it will pay out to shareholders. Some evidence suggests that investors are not concerned with a company's dividend policy since they can sell a portion of their portfolio of equities if they want cash.
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
dividend, policy
Related to DIVIDEND POLICY
 

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
dividend policy H H Accountancy 1 March 18th, 2016 02:54 PM
dividend policy Ranjay YAdav Infosystems MIS 3 February 19th, 2016 12:42 AM
ppt on dividend policy prachii Financial Management 29 March 17th, 2013 08:44 PM
Financial-Management-ch-dividend-policy rohini.r619 Financial Management 3 November 1st, 2009 03:38 PM
Dividend Policy: Does It Matter? Kumar Kum Articles !! 0 May 5th, 2009 08:13 AM
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


ManagementParadise.com is not responsible for the views and opinion of the posters. The posters and only posters shall be liable for any copyright infringement.



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.