ManagementParadise.com : Worlds Leading Management Portal. MBA | Classroom, Boardroom and Beyond


Go Back   ManagementParadise.com Forums - Your MBA Online Degree Program and Management Students Forum for MBA,BMS, MMS, BMM, BBA, students & aspirants. > Projects HUB for Management Students ( MBA Projects and dissertations / BMS Projects / BBA Projects > Resolve Your Query - Get Help and discuss Projects > Marketing Management ( RM , IM )

What is Porter Model?

What is Porter Model?

Discuss What is Porter Model? within the Marketing Management ( RM , IM ) forums, part of the Resolve Your Query - Get Help and discuss Projects category; Hello, This is bcoz one of my friend doing his PGP told me, its beneficial to have knowledge of a ...

Reply

 

LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
Advertisements
What is Porter Model?
Old
 (1 (permalink))
lijothomasb
lijothomasb is an unknown quantity at this point
 
lijothomasb
Status: Offline
Posts: 1
Join Date: Oct 2006
Smile What is Porter Model? - October 7th, 2006

Hello,

This is bcoz one of my friend doing his PGP told me, its beneficial to have knowledge of a no. of things. Kindly let me know about Porter Model? Thank you
Advertisements
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Related to What is Porter Model?
 

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Model Evaluation Help!!! cool_gal Econometrics ( Ecotrix ) 2 March 31st, 2008 12:24 AM
AICC MODEL... Roshni Bhatia Entrepreneurship 1 June 27th, 2007 06:56 AM
New Retail Model kataria.bhavesh PUBLISH / UPLOAD PROJECT OR DOWNLOAD REFERENCE PROJECT 1 March 25th, 2007 08:30 AM
 

Re: What is Porter Model?
Old
 (2 (permalink))
enigma
enigma has a spectacular aura aboutenigma has a spectacular aura about
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 108
Join Date: Feb 2006
Re: What is Porter Model? - October 7th, 2006

PORTERS FIVE FORCE ANALYSIS-A MODEL FOR INDUSTRY ANALYSIS

The model of pure competition implies that risk-adjusted rates of return should be constant across firms and industries. However, numerous economic studies have affirmed that different industries can sustain different levels of profitability; part of this difference is explained by industry structure.

Michael Porter provided a framework that models an industry as being influenced by five forces. The strategic business manager seeking to develop an edge over rival firms can use this model to better understand the industry context in which the firm operates.



I. Rivalry

In the traditional economic model, competition among rival firms drives profits to zero. But competition is not perfect and firms are not unsophisticated passive price takers. Rather, firms strive for a competitive advantage over their rivals. The intensity of rivalry among firms varies across industries, and strategic analysts are interested in these differences.

Economists measure rivalry by indicators of industry concentration. The Concentration Ratio (CR) is one such measure. The Bureau of Census periodically reports the CR for major Standard Industrial Classifications (SIC's). The CR indicates the percent of market share held by the four largest firms (CR's for the largest 8, 25, and 50 firms in an industry also are available). A high concentration ratio indicates that a high concentration of market share is held by the largest firms - the industry is concentrated. With only a few firms holding a large market share, the competitive landscape is less competitive (closer to a monopoly). A low concentration ratio indicates that the industry is characterized by many rivals, none of which has a significant market share. These fragmented markets are said to be competitive. The concentration ratio is not the only available measure; the trend is to define industries in terms that convey more information than distribution of market share.

If rivalry among firms in an industry is low, the industry is considered to be disciplined. This discipline may result from the industry's history of competition, the role of a leading firm, or informal compliance with a generally understood code of conduct. Explicit collusion generally is illegal and not an option; in low-rivalry industries competitive moves must be constrained informally. However, a maverick firm seeking a competitive advantage can displace the otherwise disciplined market.

When a rival acts in a way that elicits a counter-response by other firms, rivalry intensifies. The intensity of rivalry commonly is referred to as being cutthroat, intense, moderate, or weak, based on the firms' aggressiveness in attempting to gain an advantage.

In pursuing an advantage over its rivals, a firm can choose from several competitive moves:

* Changing prices - raising or lowering prices to gain a temporary advantage.
* Improving product differentiation - improving features, implementing innovations in the manufacturing process and in the product itself.
* Creatively using channels of distribution - using vertical integration or using a distribution channel that is novel to the industry. For example, with high-end jewelry stores reluctant to carry its watches, Timex moved into drugstores and other non-traditional outlets and cornered the low to mid-price watch market.
* Exploiting relationships with suppliers - for example, from the 1950's to the 1970's Sears, Roebuck and Co. dominated the retail household appliance market. Sears set high quality standards and required suppliers to meet its demands for product specifications and price.

The intensity of rivalry is influenced by the following industry characteristics:

1. A larger number of firms increases rivalry because more firms must compete for the same customers and resources. The rivalry intensifies if the firms have similar market share, leading to a struggle for market leadership.
2. Slow market growth causes firms to fight for market share. In a growing market, firms are able to improve revenues simply because of the expanding market.
3. High fixed costs result in an economy of scale effect that increases rivalry. When total costs are mostly fixed costs, the firm must produce near capacity to attain the lowest unit costs. Since the firm must sell this large quantity of product, high levels of production lead to a fight for market share and results in increased rivalry.
4. High storage costs or highly perishable products cause a producer to sell goods as soon as possible. If other producers are attempting to unload at the same time, competition for customers intensifies.
5. Low switching costs increases rivalry. When a customer can freely switch from one product to another there is a greater struggle to capture customers.
6. Low levels of product differentiation is associated with higher levels of rivalry. Brand identification, on the other hand, tends to constrain rivalry.
7. Strategic stakes are high when a firm is losing market position or has potential for great gains. This intensifies rivalry.
8. High exit barriers place a high cost on abandoning the product. The firm must compete. High exit barriers cause a firm to remain in an industry, even when the venture is not profitable. A common exit barrier is asset specificity. When the plant and equipment required for manufacturing a product is highly specialized, these assets cannot easily be sold to other buyers in another industry. Litton Industries' acquisition of Ingalls Shipbuilding facilities illustrates this concept. Litton was successful in the 1960's with its contracts to build Navy ships. But when the Vietnam war ended, defense spending declined and Litton saw a sudden decline in its earnings. As the firm restructured, divesting from the shipbuilding plant was not feasible since such a large and highly specialized investment could not be sold easily, and Litton was forced to stay in a declining shipbuilding market.
9. A diversity of rivals with different cultures, histories, and philosophies make an industry unstable. There is greater possibility for mavericks and for misjudging rival's moves. Rivalry is volatile and can be intense. The hospital industry, for example, is populated by hospitals that historically are community or charitable institutions, by hospitals that are associated with religious organizations or universities, and by hospitals that are for-profit enterprises. This mix of philosophies about mission has lead occasionally to fierce local struggles by hospitals over who will get expensive diagnostic and therapeutic services. At other times, local hospitals are highly cooperative with one another on issues such as community disaster planning.
10. Industry Shakeout. A growing market and the potential for high profits induces new firms to enter a market and incumbent firms to increase production. A point is reached where the industry becomes crowded with competitors, and demand cannot support the new entrants and the resulting increased supply. The industry may become crowded if its growth rate slows and the market becomes saturated, creating a situation of excess capacity with too many goods chasing too few buyers. A shakeout ensues, with intense competition, price wars, and company failures.

BCG founder Bruce Henderson generalized this observation as the Rule of Three and Four: a stable market will not have more than three significant competitors, and the largest competitor will have no more than four times the market share of the smallest. If this rule is true, it implies that:
* If there is a larger number of competitors, a shakeout is inevitable
* Surviving rivals will have to grow faster than the market
* Eventual losers will have a negative cash flow if they attempt to grow
* All except the two largest rivals will be losers
* The definition of what constitutes the "market" is strategically important.

Whatever the merits of this rule for stable markets, it is clear that market stability and changes in supply and demand affect rivalry. Cyclical demand tends to create cutthroat competition. This is true in the disposable diaper industry in which demand fluctuates with birth rates, and in the greeting card industry in which there are more predictable business cycles.

II. Threat Of Substitutes

In Porter's model, substitute products refer to products in other industries. To the economist, a threat of substitutes exists when a product's demand is affected by the price change of a substitute product. A product's price elasticity is affected by substitute products - as more substitutes become available, the demand becomes more elastic since customers have more alternatives. A close substitute product constrains the ability of firms in an industry to raise prices.

The competition engendered by a Threat of Substitute comes from products outside the industry. The price of aluminum beverage cans is constrained by the price of glass bottles, steel cans, and plastic containers. These containers are substitutes, yet they are not rivals in the aluminum can industry. To the manufacturer of automobile tires, tire retreads are a substitute. Today, new tires are not so expensive that car owners give much consideration to retreading old tires. But in the trucking industry new tires are expensive and tires must be replaced often. In the truck tire market, retreading remains a viable substitute industry. In the disposable diaper industry, cloth diapers are a substitute and their prices constrain the price of disposables.

While the treat of substitutes typically impacts an industry through price competition, there can be other concerns in assessing the threat of substitutes. Consider the substitutability of different types of TV transmission: local station transmission to home TV antennas via the airways versus transmission via cable, satellite, and telephone lines. The new technologies available and the changing structure of the entertainment media are contributing to competition among these substitute means of connecting the home to entertainment. Except in remote areas it is unlikely that cable TV could compete with free TV from an aerial without the greater diversity of entertainment that it affords the customer.

III. Buyer Power

The power of buyers is the impact that customers have on a producing industry. In general, when buyer power is strong, the relationship to the producing industry is near to what an economist terms a monopsony - a market in which there are many suppliers and one buyer. Under such market conditions, the buyer sets the price. In reality few pure monopsonies exist, but frequently there is some asymmetry between a producing industry and buyers.

IV. Supplier Power

A producing industry requires raw materials - labor, components, and other supplies. This requirement leads to buyer-supplier relationships between the industry and the firms that provide it the raw materials used to create products. Suppliers, if powerful, can exert an influence on the producing industry, such as selling raw materials at a high price to capture some of the industry's profits.

V. Barriers to Entry / Threat of Entry

It is not only incumbent rivals that pose a threat to firms in an industry; the possibility that new firms may enter the industry also affects competition. In theory, any firm should be able to enter and exit a market, and if free entry and exit exists, then profits always should be nominal. In reality, however, industries possess characteristics that protect the high profit levels of firms in the market and inhibit additional rivals from entering the market. These are barriers to entry.

Barriers to entry are more than the normal equilibrium adjustments that markets typically make. For example, when industry profits increase, we would expect additional firms to enter the market to take advantage of the high profit levels, over time driving down profits for all firms in the industry. When profits decrease, we would expect some firms to exit the market thus restoring a market equilibrium. Falling prices, or the expectation that future prices will fall, deters rivals from entering a market. Firms also may be reluctant to enter markets that are extremely uncertain, especially if entering involves expensive start-up costs. These are normal accommodations to market conditions. But if firms individually (collective action would be illegal collusion) keep prices artificially low as a strategy to prevent potential entrants from entering the market, such entry-deterring pricing establishes a barrier.

Barriers to entry are unique industry characteristics that define the industry. Barriers reduce the rate of entry of new firms, thus maintaining a level of profits for those already in the industry. From a strategic perspective, barriers can be created or exploited to enhance a firm's competitive advantage. Barriers to entry arise from several sources:

1. Government creates barriers. Although the principal role of the government in a market is to preserve competition through anti-trust actions, government also restricts competition through the granting of monopolies and through regulation. Industries such as utilities are considered natural monopolies because it has been more efficient to have one electric company provide power to a locality than to permit many electric companies to compete in a local market. To restrain utilities from exploiting this advantage, government permits a monopoly, but regulates the industry. Illustrative of this kind of barrier to entry is the local cable company. The franchise to a cable provider may be granted by competitive bidding, but once the franchise is awarded by a community a monopoly is created. Local governments were not effective in monitoring price gouging by cable operators, so the federal government has enacted legislation to review and restrict prices.

The regulatory authority of the government in restricting competition is historically evident in the banking industry. Until the 1970's, the markets that banks could enter were limited by state governments. As a result, most banks were local commercial and retail banking facilities. Banks competed through strategies that emphasized simple marketing devices such as awarding toasters to new customers for opening a checking account. When banks were deregulated, banks were permitted to cross state boundaries and expand their markets. Deregulation of banks intensified rivalry and created uncertainty for banks as they attempted to maintain market share. In the late 1970's, the strategy of banks shifted from simple marketing tactics to mergers and geographic expansion as rivals attempted to expand markets.
2. Patents and proprietary knowledge serve to restrict entry into an industry. Ideas and knowledge that provide competitive advantages are treated as private property when patented, preventing others from using the knowledge and thus creating a barrier to entry. Edwin Land introduced the Polaroid camera in 1947 and held a monopoly in the instant photography industry. In 1975, Kodak attempted to enter the instant camera market and sold a comparable camera. Polaroid sued for patent infringement and won, keeping Kodak out of the instant camera industry.
3. Asset specificity inhibits entry into an industry. Asset specificity is the extent to which the firm's assets can be utilized to produce a different product. When an industry requires highly specialized technology or plants and equipment, potential entrants are reluctant to commit to acquiring specialized assets that cannot be sold or converted into other uses if the venture fails. Asset specificity provides a barrier to entry for two reasons: First, when firms already hold specialized assets they fiercely resist efforts by others from taking their market share. New entrants can anticipate aggressive rivalry. For example, Kodak had much capital invested in its photographic equipment business and aggressively resisted efforts by Fuji to intrude in its market. These assets are both large and industry specific. The second reason is that potential entrants are reluctant to make investments in highly specialized assets.
4. Organizational (Internal) Economies of Scale. The most cost efficient level of production is termed Minimum Efficient Scale (MES). This is the point at which unit costs for production are at minimum - i.e., the most cost efficient level of production. If MES for firms in an industry is known, then we can determine the amount of market share necessary for low cost entry or cost parity with rivals. For example, in long distance communications roughly 10% of the market is necessary for MES. If sales for a long distance operator fail to reach 10% of the market, the firm is not competitive.

The existence of such an economy of scale creates a barrier to entry. The greater the difference between industry MES and entry unit costs, the greater the barrier to entry. So industries with high MES deter entry of small, start-up businesses. To operate at less than MES there must be a consideration that permits the firm to sell at a premium price - such as product differentiation or local monopoly.


Barriers to exit work similarly to barriers to entry. Exit barriers limit the ability of a firm to leave the market and can exacerbate rivalry - unable to leave the industry, a firm must compete.


"I'm going to show these people what you don't want them to see. I'm going to show them a world without you... a world without rules and controls, without borders or boundaries. A world... where anything is possible. Where we go from here is a choice I leave to you."
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Re: What is Porter Model?
Old
 (3 (permalink))
vengabeats
vengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud ofvengabeats has much to be proud of
 
Financial Analyst at Transparent Value
 
Awards Showcase
Status: Offline
Posts: 2,529
Join Date: Jul 2005
Re: What is Porter Model? - October 7th, 2006

Quote:
Originally Posted by lijothomasb
Hello,

This is bcoz one of my friend doing his PGP told me, its beneficial to have knowledge of a no. of things. Kindly let me know about Porter Model? Thank you
Yes..it is very benificial
Chk this link
http://www.quickmba.com/strategy/porter.shtml


It's better to let someone think you are an Idiot than to open your mouth and prove it.



Friends: (18)
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Re: What is Porter Model?
Old
 (4 (permalink))
sachin.xime
sachin.xime is an unknown quantity at this point
 
sachin.xime
Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Join Date: Oct 2006
Re: What is Porter Model? - October 24th, 2006

These guys right but their are two other porter model one is -

Porter's Value Chain ( U can find on wikipedia or 1st chapter of marketing management by kotler )

One other Model by michel poter is dimond model which tell the comperartive advantage of the nation ( easly available on Net )

Bye
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Re: What is Porter Model?
Old
 (5 (permalink))
kumar.neeraj.83
kumar.neeraj.83 is an unknown quantity at this point
 
kumar.neeraj.83
Status: Offline
Posts: 3
Join Date: Oct 2006
Re: What is Porter Model? - October 24th, 2006

which of the porter's theory you are looking for:
1. Value Chain
2. Porters five forces
3. Porters Dimond
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Re: What is Porter Model?
Old
 (6 (permalink))
sachin.xime
sachin.xime is an unknown quantity at this point
 
sachin.xime
Status: Offline
Posts: 5
Join Date: Oct 2006
Re: What is Porter Model? - October 25th, 2006

I Knew all three ( if this question was for me )

sachin
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Re: What is Porter Model?
Old
 (7 (permalink))
Evol Tn
evol_tn is a jewel in the roughevol_tn is a jewel in the roughevol_tn is a jewel in the rough
 
evol_tn
Student of MBA at DU
Delhi, Delhi
 
Institute: DU
Status: Offline
Posts: 108
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Delhi, Delhi
Re: What is Porter Model? - December 21st, 2006

Michael Porter has described a category scheme consisting of three general types of strategies that are commonly used by businesses. These three generic strategies are defined along two dimensions: strategic scope and strategic strength.

Complete article is attached in the document.
Attached Files
File Type: doc porter.doc (47.0 KB, 85 views)
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to For This Useful Post:
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
model, porter

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Login
Forgot Password?  New User?
  

» Ads





» Recent Threads

Test Bank on Financial... ( 1 2 3)
24 Minutes Ago 08:50 AM
28 Replies
Solution manual on... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
1 Hour Ago 07:58 AM
40 Replies
Sample Bio-data...
Last post by Yashwant Naik
11 Hours Ago 09:30 PM
7 Replies
Indian Rupee Update by...
Last post by Epic Research
16 Hours Ago 05:03 PM
1 Replies
Asian Markets Update by...
Last post by Epic Research
16 Hours Ago 05:01 PM
1 Replies
BMS notes for mp : all... ( 1 2 3... Last Page)
Last post by Nandini Bharat
20 Hours Ago 12:57 PM
253 Replies
AIMA-MAT 2014, MAT...
Last post by Pramit Singh
21 Hours Ago 12:08 PM
0 Replies
CAT 2014 Latest News,...
Last post by Pramit Singh
21 Hours Ago 11:56 AM
0 Replies
Top 5 Beautiful Villages...
Last post by Vinod Gupta
21 Hours Ago 11:28 AM
0 Replies
Solution manual on... ( 1 2 3)
Last post by Bhautik Kawa
22 Hours Ago 11:01 AM
22 Replies
FAQ's about Studying...
Last post by Raj Verma
1 Day Ago 04:58 PM
1 Replies
MBA ABROAD - FAQ's
Last post by Raj Verma
1 Day Ago 04:34 PM
0 Replies
IELTS Test Details ( 1 2)
Last post by Raj Verma
1 Day Ago 04:18 PM
11 Replies
Coaching classes...a...
Last post by Raj Verma
1 Day Ago 03:57 PM
0 Replies
Should mobile phones be...
Last post by Raj Verma
1 Day Ago 03:54 PM
0 Replies

» Projects Helpline

Retail Management Notes
Last post by Bhautik Kawa
1 Day Ago 10:56 AM
ManagementParadise.com is not responsible for the views and opinion of the posters. The posters and only posters shall be liable for any copyright infringement.


Management Paradise
About Us
Press
Jobs
Contact Us
Kartik Raichura
Legal
Terms & Conditions
Privacy Policy
Disclaimer
Copyrights
Help
Zeitgeist
Support
FAQs
Tour
Feedback
Partners
Follow
Copyright © 2004 - 2013 Management Paradise. Site Developed by Available.co.in