Go Back   ManagementParadise.com | Management & Business Education Learning Platform BMM Paradise for Bachelors in Mass Media Forum > Introduction to Journalism


Discuss UNDERCOVER JOURNALISM AND ETHICS within the Introduction to Journalism forums, part of the BMM Paradise for Bachelors in Mass Media Forum category; INDIA TV'S STING operations, ostensibly aimed at exposing the prevalent sexual exploitation in the entertainment industry, raise knotty but important ...



Thread Tools Display Modes
 (1 (permalink))
Sunanda K. Chavan
sunandaC has a spectacular aura aboutsunandaC has a spectacular aura aboutsunandaC has a spectacular aura about
Management Paradise Guru
Status: Offline
Posts: 6,680
Join Date: Jul 2010

INDIA TV'S STING operations, ostensibly aimed at exposing the prevalent sexual exploitation in the entertainment industry, raise knotty but important issues relating to journalistic ethics. Hidden cameras captured a Bollywood actor and a TV game show host seeking sexual favours from a young woman reporter of the news channel, who posed as an aspiring starlet seeking a break in the industry.

If there is a deep sense of distaste about the two undercover ‘investigations’, it is partly because the television channel went out of its way to entice the individuals into behaving inappropriately before capturing them on videotape. India TV's Editor-in-Chief Rajat Sharma's justification for carrying out the sting — exposing the casting couch menace in the entertainment industry — has a hollow ring to it. All that was exposed by India TV, which carried out the stings with offers of whiskey and invitations to hotel rooms, were the frailties of two sad and susceptible men.

It was sordid ensnarement, not enlightening investigation.

Undercover journalism is not a new phenomenon in India. In 1981, a newspaper reporter bid for and bought a young woman, ‘Kamala’, for Rs 2,300 at a ‘sale’ in Madhya Pradesh to establish trafficking in women and the involvement of bigwigs in the racket.

More recently, Tehelka used deception and hidden cameras to expose ‘match fixing’ in cricket and, more importantly, to show how easily penetrable and corruptible a section of the defence establishment was. Some of the methods used by Tehelka to acquire information were rightly criticised, particularly, the use of call girls in a flagrant exercise of entrapment. But the investigation, which revealed how deeply entrenched corruption was in the process of defence procurement, did have a serious public purpose.

In contrast, the India TV sting operations were widely perceived to be ploys to attract more eyeballs and increase the profile of the news channel.

The central point is that investigative journalism that insists on going after information through deception and invasion of privacy can have only one serious defence: a larger social purpose.

Undercover investigations by journalists go back a long way. It was in 1887 that the celebrated Nellie Bly feigned illness, got herself admitted to a notoriously ill-administered New York lunatic asylum, and wrote a powerful expose that hastened legal reforms relating to the treatment of the mentally ill. It was socially purposeful and impactful undercover journalism at its best. Three decades ago a Pulitzer Prize for journalism was awarded to a reporter who concealed his identity in order to write a series of articles on voting irregularities in Chicago.

These investigations have won admiration within the profession and from the public, which suggests that relevant and purposeful undercover journalism is not merely acceptable under certain conditions but is an indispensable force for the social good.

Journalism that relies on active deception and, more typically, `passive' misrepresentation to acquire information must satisfy at least the following three professional ethical requirements. First, the information pursued must be directly and strongly linked to a larger social purpose. Secondly, the public value of such information must clearly outweigh the injury caused by the deception and the privacy violation. Thirdly, undercover methods must not be resorted to where the information can be gathered by straightforward means.

The problem with the India TV sting operations is that they fulfill neither the first nor the second condition. The lukewarm public response suggests there is a reflexive understanding of this in Indian society. Yellow journalism should provoke those in the profession to think more deeply about the purposes and methods of journalism, and to take a clear stand on the interface between freedom of expression, and professional and social responsibility.

Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote


ethics, journalism, undercover

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Managerial ethics/Consumer Perception abt ethics in Indian Telecom Sector nirav.simca Marketing Research ( MR ) 3 April 14th, 2011 12:14 AM
INVESTIGATIVE JOURNALISM Sunanda K. Chavan Introduction to Journalism 0 October 29th, 2010 01:52 PM
UNDERCOVER JOURNALISM AND ETHICS Abhijeet S LAW 0 October 20th, 2010 03:50 PM
ETHICS OF JOURNALISM Sunanda K. Chavan Introduction to Journalism 0 September 3rd, 2010 03:49 PM
BMM - journalism network.burner General Talks 10 February 18th, 2010 04:12 PM

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off

ManagementParadise.com is not responsible for the views and opinion of the posters. The posters and only posters shall be liable for any copyright infringement.

Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.