Okay.. Bhavin is out on a vacation and I doubt if he would be replying .
Let me get started...
Overall a confused GD ..
Let me try to give how I would perceive the topic as :
There are too many People and too few human beings.
The topic implies that people in todays world are lurking for material wealth. The joy that they get is from T.V and Video Games and Hi-tech gadgets and not from fellow human contact.
Everyone is on the run for money and power by hook or by crook. If it renders the other jobless or if it kills someone , that is not their concern.
There is an example of Nestle, when it started using breast milk to make milk powder and promoted it. The people working in the organisation are not concerned with the ill effect, neither is the company.. they want money..
Now , Humanity on the other hand does not mean being mother teresa or giving charity. There were points raised like, John Abrahim gives 70 % of his earning.
Your earnings are your efforts fruits. You need not part with it. Parting with your money does not make you a human being. Giving alms to a begger does not make you a human being. Its the beggars karma to own his money .
So then what do we mean by human beings. Human beings would mean people who are satisfied with their lives and with what they want. They are not greedy. They are not materialistic. They do not enjoy seeing others suffer. They are helpful . They are passionate. They feel for someones suffering .
The topic there are many people but very few human absolutely holds true in todays world because most of us are now ' MECHANIC ' . We work like machines. We get up, we work , we get material wealth, and power to yell at others and that makes us happy.
A Human being is the one who takes time to appreciate the world, he is not mechanic. He may not be able to help a person monetarily but his few compasionate words make the distressed feel good.
Most of the Gd Takers confused humans with heros or people who have embossed their name in history with golden words, which is clearly not the case.
================================================== ======
Now that we are clear on that ..
Gd Taker ie. gavrau has raised very less points, His comments were repetitive and focused on " Karma " of a human being.
( Ravans Karma was to do what he did and same for Rams karma.. Karma is not positive or negative. The outcome is . Hence I am not able to relate it with this topic )
Mital Shah : Did a good thing of opening the GD, but couldnt sustain it. Commented only thrice in the whole GD .
bang_nidhi : Actually opened the GD. Had a balanced view point. Has Potential.
mba_nid_sha: She would clear the GD if it was only uptil her this statement
Quote:
|
1 helping hand is enough to help a lot of people so obviously we do not need as many good ppl as the ppl in need are
|
Later on she just lost focus.
surendravarma_u : Too less points. But whatever he said was upto the mark. Had it going if wouldve interacted more.
amit lahoti : Needs Practice.
Moni : Started well.. But got into things like family which were not necessary.
goyalsahil : Has potential. Needs Direction.
Kartik Raita : With his Theory of Self Actualisation, he makes a certain impact . His other points are repetitive but he gets the GD going.
If this was actual GD, I would consider Kartik Raita and Bang Nidhi .