Quote:
Originally Posted by sunandaC its either way nothing is gonna change only the people getting benefited by the bribe would change thats it |
I don't agree!
While in government owned companies almost all level of employees are corrupt and can boycott their job whenever they desire. They get an opportunity to enjoy good deal of freedom from bureaucratic point of view. Also they don't have to worry about getting fired.
However, with private organizations the scenario is much different. If the government officials aren't corrupt then there's almost no chance of corruption. For example, the private companies will have to provide quality goods and services because their main motive is to maximize profit and if they don't do so, their competitors will overtake them. (This isn't the case with govt. owned organizations). So, the people will ultimately be much more benefited.
Again the employees will have to be more accountable with their job as they will be fired if they don't work properly.
However, the profit will go to the limited owners but still they will pay good amount of tax (provided that govt. officials aren't corrupt) and that money will again be used for public good (again provided that govt. officials aren't corrupt)
So, privatization is obviously much better and will lead to less corruption undoubtedly.