Go Back   ManagementParadise.com | Management & Business Education Learning Platform PUBLISH / UPLOAD PROJECT OR DOWNLOAD REFERENCE PROJECT > Financial Management

Financial Analysis of Kimberly-Clark

Discuss Financial Analysis of Kimberly-Clark within the Financial Management forums, part of the PUBLISH / UPLOAD PROJECT OR DOWNLOAD REFERENCE PROJECT category; Kimberly-Clark (NYSE: KMB) is a consumer products giant. The multi-billion dollar corporation produces mainly paper products, including well-known brands such ...

Reply

 

Thread Tools Display Modes
Financial Analysis of Kimberly-Clark
Old
 (1 (permalink))
Netra Shetty
netrashetty is on a distinguished road
 
netrashetty
Student of PGDM at Mats Institute of Management and Entrepreneurship
Bangalore, Karnataka
Management Paradise Guru
 
Status: Offline
Posts: 4,857
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Bangalore, Karnataka
Financial Analysis of Kimberly-Clark - February 19th, 2011

Kimberly-Clark (NYSE: KMB) is a consumer products giant. The multi-billion dollar corporation produces mainly paper products, including well-known brands such as Kleenex, Huggies, and Scott paper towels. Kimberly-Clark is perhaps most recognized for its innovation in its Pull-Ups diapers, a product to potty-train children with disposable diapers which seem to the child like underwear. This innovation, however, has not been followed up with more new consumer products in the past decade. With Kimberly-Clark's lack of return on research and development investment, new revenue generation will continue to be difficult to achieve.

With $19.1 billion in sales for FY 2009 and net income of $1.88 billion [1], Kimberly-Clark is a large force to be reckoned with in the consumer products industry. The company continues to hold a significant market share in paper hygiene products, with the No. 1 or No. 2 market share position in more than 80 countries.[2]

Rising material costs and competition provide further obstacles in the consumer products industry, and Kimberly-Clark is definitely feeling the changes in rising oil prices, forestation regulations, and costs of wood pulp. To combat rising commodity prices, KMB announced actions to reduce its worldwide workforce by 1,600 by the end of 2009, which resulted in pretax charges of $128 million in 2009.[3] Additionally, as consumers in the United States have become more price-aware spenders, KMB has seen enormous sales growth in developing and emerging markets. For example, its Kleenex bathroom tissue captured 10% market share in Russia after only a year after launch. [4]

Contents
1 Company Overview
2 Business Segments
3 Trends and Forces
3.1 Raw Materials and Regulation
3.1.1 Climate Changes
3.1.2 Government Regulations
3.1.3 Environmental Sensitivity
3.1.4 Supermarket Consolidation
3.2 Population Demographics
3.3 Emerging Market Growth
3.4 Customer Interaction and Collaboration with Retailers
3.5 Kimberly-Clark is Sensitive to Fuel and Pulp Prices
4 Competition
5 References
In the fourth quarter of 2010, Kimberly-Clark reported net income of $492 ($1.20 per share), flat from the fourth quarter of 2009 when it reported EPS of $1.17 per share. Revenue increased 1.9% to $5.08 billion. Excluding foreign exchange, acquisitions, and divestitures, organic sales rose 3%, helped by higher prices of 2%. High unemployment is driving shoppers to private-label and lower-priced products such as Procter & Gamble Company (PG)'s "Bounty Basics" line. The company is looking to exit the integrated pulp manufacturing business and sell a number of its plants, which will cost $280 - $420 million after tax, though it will increase operating profit by at least $75 million a year. In the coming year, KMB will repurchase $1.5 billion of shares.[5]

Company Overview

Kimberly-Clark is a complex company with many different product areas. It is primarily a health and hygiene manufacturer, with well-known brands such as Kleenex, Huggies, Kotex, Pull-Ups, Scott, Andrex, Poise, and Depend. If you have been to a toilet or kitchen, you have likely seen a product made by Kimberly-Clark.

The company had sales of $19.1 billion in 2009,[1] 76% of which came from sales of diapers, wipes, feminine products, tissues, paper towels, toilet paper, and other related paper tissue products. Kimberly-Clark has also made a foray into the medical world with Kimberly-Clark Health Care, providing hygiene and sanitary products for health care professionals. Emerging market sales are now 31% of revenues, up from 25% a few years ago. Part of the success is driven by KMB's thorough consumer research, which includes home visits and shopping trips with consumers to better understand purchase decisions.

Based in Dallas, Texas, Kimberly-Clark has operations all over the world, selling its products in over 150 countries. It employees around 55,000 individuals at numerous locations.

Business Segments

Kimberly-Clark operates into following four operating business segments. These business segments are based on product groupings.


Personal Care (43.7% of net sales, 61.6% of operating profit [6]): The Personal Care segment manufactures and markets disposable diapers, training and youth pants, and swimpants; baby wipes; feminine and incontinence care products; and related products. Products in this segment are primarily for household use and are sold under a variety of brand names, including Huggies, Pull-Ups, Little Swimmers, GoodNites, Kotex, Lightdays, Depend, Poise and other brand names.
Consumer Tissue (33.5% of net sales, 26.1% of operating profit [6]): The Consumer Tissue segment manufactures and markets facial and bathroom tissue, paper towels, napkins and related products for household use. Products in this segment are sold under the Kleenex, Scott, Cottonelle, Viva, Andrex, Scottex, Hakle, Page and other brand names.
K-C Professional & Other (15.7% of net sales, 16.4% of operating profit [6]): The K-C Professional & Other segment manufactures and markets facial and bathroom tissue, paper towels, napkins, wipers and a range of safety products for the away-from-home marketplace. Products in this segment are sold under the Kimberly-Clark, Kleenex, Scott, WypAll, Kimtech, Kleenguard and Kimcare brand names. This division was the only segment to post a fall in operating profit margin in the first quarter of 2009. Analysts say the division is struggling with the economic downturn because its customers include many restaurants and food service businesses. [7]
Health Care (8.7% of net sales, 8.6% of operating profit [6]): The Health Care segment manufactures and markets health care products such as surgical gowns, drapes, infection control products, sterilization wrap, disposable face masks and exam gloves, respiratory products and other disposable medical products. Products in this segment are sold under the Kimberly-Clark, Ballard and other brand names.
Trends and Forces

Raw Materials and Regulation
In addition to oil, Kimberly-Clark relies very heavily on other natural resources, namely trees from which it produces its paper products. The price of lumber is at the mercy of many forces, few of which can be controlled by Kimberly-Clark, and so this creates further uncertainty about the cost of production which once again creates uncertainty about revenue. Some factors include:

Climate Changes
Severe storms, droughts, and other weather phenomena effect the price of lumber. If severe weather occurs, growing seasons could be reduced, not as much lumber could be available, and this could raise the cost of lumber. A rise in the cost of lumber would decrease revenue margins, hurting Kimberly-Clark’s profits.

Government Regulations
There are strict regulations in developed (and some developing) countries about lumber harvesting. Only a certain number of trees can be taken and a certain number must be replanted. As regulations increase, the cost of lumber also increases, and in some cases the supply of lumber could be decreased. In the long run, regulation ensures that there will always be lumber, but if less is available it will cost more, once again driving up the cost of raw materials for Kimberly-Clark.

Environmental Sensitivity
Over the past few years, Kimberly-Clark has received negative attention from environmental activists at Greenpeace who claim that the company is cutting down ancient growth forests. The Kleercut campaign aims to smear Kimberly-Clark's reputation, and in some areas this has effected Kimberly-Clark's image and sales. The company is combating the campaign by claiming it is using sustainable methods and banning lumber harvesting on the Pacific Coast. Furthermore, KMB has also stepped up its use of environmentally sustainable business practices including use of green energy, like wind or solar power. Because of its enhanced environmental image, KMB found its way to the EPA's National Top 50 list of Fortune 500 green power users, ranked ninth.[8]

Supermarket Consolidation
As the supermarket industry becomes more consolidated, a smaller number of Kimberly-Clark's customers are accounting for a steadily larger percentage of its total sales. A prime example is Wal-Mart, Kimberly-Clark's largest customer, who accounted for around 13% of the company's 2007 sales.[9] As a result of this increasing dependence on fewer customers, Kimberly-Clark is losing a great deal of its ability to price its goods at a level that maximizes its own profit margins. Since Wal-Mart and other large retailers buy such a large amount of the company's goods, they can effectively bargain for lower prices; without them, Kimberly-Clark would lose a large percentage of its business. Also, retail chains, Wal-Mart in particular, have been placing an increased focus on private label goods, which provide higher margins for retailers and, usually, lower prices for customers. This trend could be detrimental to Kimberley-Clark and other manufacturers of branded goods as low-price, private label goods increase competition.

Population Demographics
One final, and perhaps underestimated, factor that shapes Kimberly-Clark's business is the number of babies being born. With diaper sales accounting for nearly a quarter of total revenue, a swing in the number of babies would likely have an effect on Kimberly-Clark's sales of diapers and total profit. The U.S. infant and toddler retail market today is worth approximately $39 billion. There is a huge amount of money to be had, and if Kimberly-Clark can tap into this with innovative ideas such as Pull-Ups training diapers, it could reap great rewards. The amount of money available does have to do with the age of a population, as well as wealth. If the US, Europe, or other developed countries see a rise in births, there will be more need for diapers, higher sales, and therefore higher revenue.

Emerging Market Growth
As with its competitors such as Proctor & Gamble, Kimberly-Clark is expanding in emerging markets to fuel much of its growth. In 2009, net sales from the company's international operations in Asia, Latin America, the Middle East, Eastern Europe, and Africa increased 5%, driven by a more than 11% increase in net selling prices and a 4% increase in sales volumes, offset by a 10% unfavorable currency effect.[10] Sales in consumer tissues in emerging markets fell 3% due to unfavorable currency effects and lower sales volumes as consumers traded down to lower-cost brands.

Customer Interaction and Collaboration with Retailers
While much of K-C's focus on targeted growth opportunities involves connecting with shoppers and users, K-C implemented a number of programs that helped it better connect with customers and become their indispensable partner.

In America and Europe, K-C gained market share by working with leading retailers to develop a new user program for K-C baby and child care products. Innovation summits and top-to-top meetings with its strategic customers in North America and Europe foster more open collaboration and helped K-C obtain insights and early support for a variety of initiatives, from new products to category development strategies.

As a result of this focus, Kimberly-Clark has seen a significant improvement in its standing among all customers. In the most recent annual Cannondale PoweRanking Survey, U.S. retailers for the first time ranked K-C among the top 10 consumer packaged goods companies. More than 350 retailers and manufacturers participated in this survey, ranking each other on strengths in areas such as sales organization, insights, supply chain management, marketing, category management and company strategy. Retailers ranked K-C substantially higher in 2006 across all measures.

Kimberly-Clark is Sensitive to Fuel and Pulp Prices
Fuel prices are one of the biggest factors in the manufacturing industry. Kimberly-Clark’s products must be shipped all around the country and the world, which requires gasoline. A rise in the price of oil can make shipping more expensive. Airlines, trucking companies, and ships all charge more to compensate for rising costs, and this extra cost must be absorbed either by the consumer or by the company. If the company passes this cost on to the consumer, this means that product prices will have to rise, which could turn away consumers and reduce sales. Alternatively, the company could leave prices alone and accept a smaller margin of profit on their products, but either way profits will likely decrease.

In addition to shipping costs, fuel costs affect general production costs. Most of Kimberly-Clark’s products come from trees, and getting the trees and manufacturing paper out of them requires an enormous amount of fuel. The entities involved are usually large factories, mills presses, et cetera, and to continue their own operations many of them also are exposed to energy related costs. A rise in fuel prices would make the production process more expensive, and as with shipping costs, the Kimberly-Clark would likely experience a decrease in revenue.

Pulp prices are a significant input factor into Kimberly Clark's cost of goods sold. Tissue products are almost 100% pulp, either tree-based or recycled. Therefore, producers are highly exposed to the price of pulp. KMB purchases about 2.5 million metric tons of pulp annually. A $50/ton price change translates into a $125 million a year movement in EBIT, or about $0.20 per share after taxes.[11] In 2011, the company plans to sell some of its pulp manufacturing plants to cut costs.

Competition

Privately owned SCA Tissue North America (SCA) is manufactures washroom paper, tabletop sheets, tissues, and other paper products. It is one of the three largest producers of away-from-home tissue products in North America, supplying restaurants, schools, convenience stores, and stadiums.

Some of Kimberly-Clark's competitors in the consumer and hygiene product markets include Proctor & Gamble, Clorox, Colgate-Palmolive Company, and L'Oreal. While all specialize in slightly different areas of the market, all are in the consumer products industry and so can be compared across metrics.


PG Competitors
Revenue ($M)* Net income ($M)* Operating Margin R&D Spending ($M) R&D as % of Total Revenue Year-over-year Revenue Growth Major Brands/Products
[Kimberly-Clark (KMB)[12][13] $19,115 $1,884 14.32% $277 1.52% 9.07% Huggies Diapers, Kleenex Tissue, Scott Paper Towels
Procter & Gamble (PG)[14] [15] $78,938 $12,736 20.30% $1,950 2.5% 3.33% Pantene, Crest, Tide, Downy, Bounty, Gillette, Duracell
Unilever NV (UN)[16][17]** €39,823 €3,659 12.6% €891 2.2% -1.73% AXE, Lipton, Slim-Fast, Vaseline, Dove, Ben & Jerry\'s
Clorox Company (CLX)[18][19] $5,534 $603 16.7% $114 2.1% 1.54% Clorox Laundry Bleach, Pine-Sol Cleaner, Glad Plastic Bags, Brita Water Filters
Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL)[20] [21] $13,790 $1,737 14.8% $269 1.4% -1.5% Colgate Toothpaste, Colgate Toothbrushes, Irish Spring Soap, Palmolive Soap, SpeedStick Deodorant
L'oreal (LRLCY)[22][23]** €17,473 €2,578 14.8% €609 3.5% -0.39% Garnier Fructis, L\'Oreal Paris, Maybelline, Ralph Lauren
*Fiscal 2010 financials available for PG. All others are fiscal 2009.

**L'Oreal and Unilever financials reported in euroes.
Advertisements

Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Re: Financial Analysis of Kimberly-Clark
Old
 (2 (permalink))
A P
aashna610 is an unknown quantity at this point
 
aashna610
Student of BMS at kkkas;d;sdsad
Bombay, Maharashtra
 
Institute: kkkas;d;sdsad
Status: Offline
Posts: 14
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Bombay, Maharashtra
Re: Financial Analysis of Kimberly-Clark - March 14th, 2011

Thanks! it is of great help. will help me a lot in my future.
Friends: (0)
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Tags
accounting analysis, annual statement, balance sheet, business finance, business valuation, debt instruments, finance companies, financial analysis, financial analysis report, financial analysts, financial ratio, financial statement, fundamental analysis, funds management, hedge funds, income statement, mutual funds, net income, p&l account, personal finance, private equity, public finance, return on equity, us company finance
Related to Financial Analysis of Kimberly-Clark
 

Similar Threads

Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Customer Relationship Management of Kimberly-Clark Anjali Khurana Marketing Management 1 August 21st, 2017 05:52 PM
Human Resource Management of Kimberly-Clark Netra Shetty Human Resources Management (H.R) 1 March 29th, 2016 01:57 PM
Organisational Structure of Kimberly-Clark Netra Shetty Human Resources Management (H.R) 1 July 1st, 2015 07:36 PM
SWOT ANALYSIS ON Kimberly-Clark Corporation Abhijeet S Principles of Management ( P.O.M) 1 June 28th, 2015 03:25 AM
Financial Analysis of World Financial Group Netra Shetty Financial Management 0 February 17th, 2011 12:32 PM
 


Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is On
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


ManagementParadise.com is not responsible for the views and opinion of the posters. The posters and only posters shall be liable for any copyright infringement.



Search Engine Optimization by vBSEO ©2011, Crawlability, Inc.