The Boeing Company (pronounced /ˈboʊ.ɪŋ/) is a major aerospace and defense corporation, founded in 1916 by William E. Boeing in Seattle, Washington. Boeing has expanded over the years, merging with McDonnell Douglas in 1997. Boeing Corporate headquarters has been in Chicago, Illinois[4] since 2001. Boeing is made up of multiple business units, which are Boeing Commercial Airplanes (BCA); Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS); Engineering, Operations & Technology; Boeing Capital; and Boeing Shared Services Group.
Boeing is among the largest global aircraft manufacturers by revenue, orders and deliveries, and the third largest aerospace and defense contractor in the world based on defense-related revenue.[5] Boeing is the largest exporter by value in the United States.[6] Its stock is a component of the Dow Jones Industrial Average.

Boeing Company (NYSE:BA) is the world's largest aerospace and defense company. In 1997, it merged with McDonnell Douglas. The company operates in over 90 countries and claims the title of America's largest exporter. Its has three divisions: commercial airplanes (49.86% of revenue), Integrated Defense Systems (IDS) (49.29%), and Boeing Capital Corporation (BCC) (0.96%)[1]. In 2009, the firm generated $60.9 billion in revenue and $2.7 billion in net income.[1]

Of the three divisions, the most prominent is the commercial airplane section. This division faces intense competition from EADS NV (EADSY) and its Airbus line of planes. However, the introduction of the 787 Dreamliner may tip the scales in Boeing's favor. This new plane has a lightweight composite material design which Boeing claims will give it a 20% increase in fuel efficiency.[2] This is particularly attractive to airlines that are struggling with record high oil prices. For example, in 1Q08, United attributed an average of nearly 60% of total operating expenses to fuel. Given the extreme volatility of jet fuel, the airline industry must increase its focus on cutting costs as it operates under historically low margins. Boeing's order book for the Dreamliner has seen its backlog rise to unprecedented levels: $349 billion.[3] First delivery of the Boeing 787 is expected to be in 4th quarter 2010.

Boeing's less visible Boeing Defense, Space & Security (BDS) division has shown significant growth recently and now earns just under half of the company's revenues. Boeing's innovation in this sector has allowed it to win numerous orders from defense programs. However, BDS still receives a hefty 80% of its earnings from the US Department of Defense[5]. This reliance exposes it to the Department's variable budget and spending patterns. The Iraq War has caused a boom on this side of Boeing's operations, but a change in foreign policy may cause a slowdown in defense spending. In addition, Boeing faces competition from other firms in this sector - in February 2007, the U.S. Air Force awarded a controversial $35 billion air refueling tanker contract to rival EADS NV (EADSY) that was widely expected to go to Boeing. In response, Boeing filed a formal appeal against the deal with the Government Accountability Office.[6] The GAO eventually ruled in Boeing's favor, resulting in a cancellation of the contract. The DOD again issued an RFP in early 2010, and BDS is again bidding against EADS. As of July 09, 2010, the bidding for the new contract ended, with EADS submitting their bid the day before, and BDS just meeting the deadline. Boeing claims the proposal would support 50,000 american jobs.[7]


Business Overview

Now headquartered in Chicago, Illinois, Boeing was originally founded in the 1910s in Seattle, Washington. After a series of mergers and splits (in which today's United Airlines was spun out, among others), Boeing emerged in the fifties as the premier US aircraft manufacturer, participating heavily in government air defense projects. It was not until 1958 that Boeing began delivery of its first commercial airplanes, the segment for which it is most commonly recognized today. Although Boeing is today perceived primarily as a maker of commercial planes, for much of its history, the company's involvement in space and defense programs has actually overshadowed its commercial airplanes manufacturing.

Boeing NASA Systems, based in Houston, is a major contributor to the space program. Boeing is responsible for building a lot of robotic equipment and hardware that NASA has used in its space shuttle and International space station.

Business and Financial Metrics
2010 Third Quarter Overview
For the third quarter of 2010, Boeing reported stronger than expected earnings and improved its 2010 outlook. The company reported an operating margin of 8.2 percent and revenue of $17.0 billion with net income of $0.8 billion.[8] They currently have a $321 billion backlog, which includes $25 billion in additional backlog from the 3rd quarter's new orders representing more than 200 commercial planes.[8]


Boeing Commercial Airplanes third-quarter revenue was $8.7 billion, on higher airplane deliveries and services volume.[8] Operating margin was 11.6 percent, reflecting the higher deliveries and continued strong operating performance.[8] The prior year quarterly results were impacted by a $2.6 billion 787 R&D reclassification and a $1.0 billion 747 charge.[8] Commercial Airplanes booked 257 gross orders during the quarter while 36 orders were removed from its order book. This contrasts with the year-ago period when net orders were 79 airplanes.[8] In the overall, the increased demand for air transportation improved the demand for aircraft, benefitting Boeing and its subsidiaries.[8]

Boeing continued to delay the final testing phases of its 787 "Dreamliner" aircraft. However, Boeing maintains that the research project has achieved a series of flight test milestones and expects first delivery mid-2011.[8]

2010 Second Quarter Overview
Boeing's financial results continued to improve between quarters while showing signs of weakness between years. Operating margin for the second quarter grew to 8.4% with a revenue of $15.6 billion.[9] While this is a significant improvement in operating margin since the first quarter 2010, this is a 50 basis point reduction since second quarter 2009.[9] Revenues were also 9% lower than last year's second quarter.[9] Despite this decrease, Boeing considers itself as being in good financial standing because of the significant reduction in commercial airplane demand and volume between the two years. Almost 90% of the reduction in revenue was due to a reduction in commercial airplane demand.[9]

Consistent with the lower volume, net income decreased by 21% to $787 million since last year's second quarter.[9] Regardless of the reduction in net income, Boeing's backlog remains at an enormous $312 billion, 5 times its total expected 2010 revenue.[9] Its assets and its backlog keep the company well grounded and provides insurance in case other segments of Boeing begin showing substantial losses.

Boeing's test flights with its 787 Dreamliner continued to make progress. As of this quarter, there are 5 airplanes in its test flight program enduring tests such as temperature and mileage.[9] The first flight delivery is planned for the end of 2010.[9] It remains to be seen whether the 787 Dreamliner will provide additional commercial airline demand for Boeing or whether the commercial airline demand continues its decline.

2010 First Quarter Overview
Operating margin grew to 7.7 percent on revenue of $15.2 billion (8% year-over-year decrease), while the company maintains $10.4 billion in cash to provide strong liquidity for 2010.[10] Operating margin expanded to 9.1 percent on strong operating performance partially offsetting the impact of lower new airplane deliveries: Boeing has increasing demand for its airplanes.[10] Backlog of $315 billion – nearly five times current annual revenue – held steady as new orders largely kept pace with deliveries.[10]

Boeing reported first- quarter net income of $0.5 billion and revenue of $15.2 billion.[10] The commercial airplane segment's first-quarter revenue was $7.5 billion - a decrease of 13%, as fewer planned 747 deliveries and seat supplier challenges resulted in 11 percent fewer airplane deliveries.[10]

Boeing expects the year to end with $64-$66 billion in revenues, in reflection of the 777 airline deliveries.[10] This is an expected decrease of 3.4% to 6.3% from 2009 levels.[1] In 2011, Boeing expects revenues to be even higher than 2009, since they expect even newer airlines - the 787 - to start being delivered.[10]

2009 Overview
Boeing increased its revenue for 2009 by 12.10% to $68.3 billion since 2008 year-end values of $60.9 billion.[11] Revenues in 2009 increased by $7,372 million due to higher revenues in commercial airplanes.[11] Commercial airplanes revenues increased by $5,788, primarily due to higher commercial airplane deliveries in 2009.[11] Deliveries in 2008 were lower as a result of a labor strike in the prior year. Boeing Defense revenues increased by $1,614 million, primarily due to higher revenues in Global Services & Support (GS&S) and Boeing Military Airplanes (BMA). Boeing Capital's revenues decreased by $43 million during the year primarily due to a decrease in the customer financing portfolio.[11]

Operating earnings in 2009 decreased by $1,854 million compared with 2008.[11] Commercial Airplanes earnings decreased by $1,769 million primarily due to $2,693 million of costs related to the first three 787 flight test aircraft included in research and development expense as a result of our determination in August 2009 that these aircraft could not be sold.[11] Lower commercial aviation services and intercompany earnings also contributed to lower 2009 earnings.[11] Boeing Defense earnings increased by $67 million compared with 2008 primarily due to higher earnings in the Boeing Military Airplanes segment. Boeing Capital operating earnings decreased $36 million reflecting lower revenues, higher impairment expense and a provision for losses.[11]

2008 Highlights
Despite Boeing's 2008 revenue decline of 8.25% to $60.9 billion, the company nonetheless has increased its revenue by a CAGR of 3.45% since 2004. In particular, revenue in the Commercial Airline division fell by 15.34%, as a strike by the International Association of Machinists (IAM) in 2008 resulted in 104 fewer airplane deliveries than planned.[11] Furthermore, net income fell 34% to $2.67 billion and contractual backlog expanded to a record level of $279 billion.[12]



Business Segments
Commercial Airplanes (49.86% of revenues[1])
Commercial airplane sales account for 49.86% of company revenues - $34.051 billion in 2009.[1]

ICommercial Airplane Revenues[1]
2007 2008 2009
Revenues ($millions) 33,386 28,263 34,051
Earnings from operations ($millions) 3,584 1,186 583

The 787 Dreamliner


The 787 has had the most successful launch of any new commercial airplane in Boeing history. Boeing just reported having 892 firm orders from 57 different customers.[13] The Dreamliner's popularity is largely due to its cost efficiency: by replacing traditional materials with carbon-fiber-reinforced plastic (which is stronger than steel and lighter than aluminum), Boeing has created an aircraft that will consume 20% less fuel than predecessor 767. But despite the promise of the 787, challenges still exist. Production delays are common in commercial airplane manufacturing, especially when a large portion of component parts are outsourced. With 75% of the 787's development and production outsourced, costly delays are a high risk. This heavy outsourcing led to a strike of about 27,000 Boeing engineers in September 2008, many of whom were involved in the manufacturing of the 787.[14] As a result, the company has stated it will do more of the production of the next 787 model "in-house" in Seattle rather than outsourcing as part of the contract settlement with its engineers that was ratified on November 1, 2008.[14]

Boeing has delayed the launch of the Dreamliner six times[15]. On late August 2010, Boeing Co. postponed the delivery of its first 787 airliner to the middle of the first quarter of 2011, adding to a string of delays that has put it more than two years past its originally scheduled debut. The latest delay is the result of engine delivery problems, Boeing said in a statement early Friday.[15] The company said in July that it expected to start delivering the plane late this year, but it warned that might not happen. Boeing said at the time that a series of problems, including supplier work related to parts of the tail and instrument issues might push the first delivery a few weeks into 2011. [15]

Integrated Defense Systems (49.29% of revenues[1])
IDS sales account for 49.29% of company revenues - $33.661 billion in 2009.[1] Here is a glimpse at the breakdown between segments for 2009:

IDS Revenues[16]
2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenues ($millions) 32,411 32,057 32,047 33,661
% of Total Company Revenues 53% 48% 53% 49.29%
Earnings from operations ($millions) 3,031 3,440 3,232 3,299

Notable IDS products include:



Fighter Jets (E/A -18G, F/A- 18E/F, F – 15E, F-22A)
Rotocraft (CH-64D Apache, CH-47 Chinook, V-22 Osprey)
Large Aircraft (C-17, C-32, C-40, KC-767, P-8A
Missiles/Bombs (e.g., Harpoon)
Satellites
Communication Systems (Joint Tactical Radio Station)
Space Systems (space shuttles, including Apollo series)
Launch Systems (sea and land based launches of satellites into orbit)
Boeing Capital Corporation (.96% of revenues[1])
BCC operations only account for .96% of company revenues - $660 million for 2009. This segment is a provider of financial solutions for commercial and government airline customers. Basically, BCC owns planes and structures leases for customers to borrow their planes. BCC’s customer financing and investment portfolio at December 31, 2009 totaled $5,666 million.[11] This part of Boeing has seen significant decline because of the amount of older planes being taken out of the airways to make room for newer, more fuel efficient planes.

Boeing Capital Corporation Performance[17]
2006 2007 2008 2009
Revenue ($millions) 1,025 815 703 660
Earnings from Operations ($millions) 291 234 162 (126)

Trends and Forces

Airline industries are more sensitive to the economy than other industries
Typically, airline companies and aircraft manufacturers are more prone to swings in revenue and equity market prices due to the release of economic indicators.[18] Consumers tend to reduce travel if personal economic conditions are suboptimal, forcing airlines to cut capacity and production. Indicators such as unemployment indices, personal income, and even home sales affect airline industries in exaggerated fashion.

Since early July, the airline index has gained 13% as carriers reported monthly double-digit unit revenue after last year's slump.[18] But now the industry is facing a slower travel season while economic data seem to indicate a general slowdown in the recovery. For the last two weeks of August 2010, many economic indicators revealed that the U.S economy has erased all of its employment recovery since one year ago. Unemployment increased unexpectedly to November 2009 levels, and existing homesales decreased by more than 27%.[18] Even though such recessionary indications typically reduce fuel futures prices, this does not fully offset the reduction in travel demand that follows a recession, and will affect the bottom line of airline companies.

Though this means less for Boeing and more for the airlines themselves, a reduced travel demand will mean significantly reduced demand for aircraft from Boeing, leaving the company vulnerable to low productivity and may affect its bottom line.

US Air Force plans $11 billion investment in Transformational Communications Satellite system
In an effort to restructure its military communications satellite system, the US Air Force hopes to award an $11 billion contract to develop a "Transformational Communications Satellite system" (or "TSAT").[19] Boeing has already done preliminary development work for the space segment of the project in a joint effort with Lockheed Martin and Northrop Grumman.[19] The TSAT system is designed to ultimately replace the military's Milstar and AEHF satellite systems and, although Boeing and its partners have already started working on the project, the Air Force issued a final request for proposals in April 2009 to encourage competition for the contract and cut government costs.[19]

Dependence on US defense budget
Boeing’s Integrated Defense Systems (IDS) revenues are largely dependent on the US Department of Defense's budget spending, and on Boeing’s ability to win new business from the Department. (Past Defense business Boeing has obtained include technology development for US Secure Border Initiative, new orders for the Apache and Chinook helicopter programs, and the Future Combat System program.)

The IDS division receives 84% of its revenue from the US Department of Defense, and due to strong congressional support for the Defense budget because of the war in Iraq, IDS saw record revenues in 2006. Defense aircraft spending may remain high as well--the average age of an Air Force aircraft is almost 25 years, so demand and support for defense aircraft replacement is high. This bodes well for Boeing, since the company produces many different kinds of fighter jets (F/A -18, F-15, F-22), tankers (KC-767) and transports (C-17, C-32A) for the US military. However, the Department of Defense's budget does vary according to perceived threat to the US, so reduced levels of global threat could have a negative effect on the budget.

Downsizing From Loss of U.S. Air Force Contract
After Boeing lost a major GPS satellite contract to Lockheed Martin (LMT) on 12 May 2008, it moved towards downsizing its satellite assembly and integration business. On 21 May, the company announced it would lay off 750 workers at its southern California satellite plants.[20] Boeing blamed the longer duration of these government contracts as a major factor for the downsizing. This means that the risk/reward profile of competing for these contracts is becoming further skewed, and the loss of a contract will have major long term implications on Boeing's operations.

Boeing Faces Risk from a Shift to Fixed Cost Development Contracts
Fixed cost development contracts allocate companies like Boeing a limited amount of money for defense product development that is not subject to change. Since defense companies often spend more money on projects than was initially agreed upon, this puts pressure on the companies. If fixed cost development contracts are indeed adopted by the US Department of Defense, Boeing could suffer.

China conflict: higher defense spending
With air traffic growth rates of 10% a year, China and its airline companies are becoming important buyers of Boeing aircraft. But China helps Boeing's profits in another way, too--a major driver of the US Defense budget is the perceived military threat from China. Recent production of the F-22, DDG-1000 destroyer, and the Virginia class submarine has been primarily attributed to the Chinese threat. And should the arms race heat up to a full-blown conflict, Boeing could be sure to reap financial benefits from a clash anticipated to be more expensive than any other. But with US-China relations normalizing, escalating tensions are not assured. The Obama administration's foreign policy will have much to reveal about the new direction of US-Chinese relations.

Exposure to airline industry's overall health


The airline industry is historically cyclical, with periodic downturns and upturns. Terrorist attacks like 9/11 and disease outbreaks like H1N1 can both have very negative impacts on airline travel, sparking an industry downturn that hurts airlines and manufacturers alike. Furthermore, Boeing depends heavily on international markets, primarily developing countries like China to maintain a steady demand for new aircraft. About two thirds of commercial airplane sales and backlogged orders come from international markets, where Boeing receives 37% of its revenue. (US$ 13.3 billion comes from Asia alone.)

However, the International Air Transport Association (IATA) warned in December 2008 that it expects the global airline industry to weaken significantly in 2009 because of an impending global recession and resulting drops in consumer demand for travel.[21] The IATA predicts that airline losses in 2008 will total to near $5 billion and will lose an additional $2.5 billion in 2009.[21] Furthermore, the IATA believes that weakened consumer travel will cause global airline traffic to fall by 3% in 2009.[21] Because of the decline in traffic and revenue, global airlines are expected to drastically cut new aircraft orders for 2009. For example, China's Civil Aviation Administration also announced in December 2008 that it was urging its airlines to cancel or postpone its new aircraft orders for 2009 because of slumping consumer demand for travel.[21]

Rising fuel costs reduce airline purchasing power
Fuel expenses are by far the largest operating expenses in the airline industry, representing about 30% of an airline's annual operating expenses on average.[22] As a result, elevating fuel costs reduce profits for airline companies, who may cut down on airplane orders to make ends meet. In 2007, for example, Southwest Airlines Company (LUV)'s fuel expenses increased 10.4% because of higher fuel costs.[23] Additionally, according to the Air Transport Association, airline industry fuel costs are expected to reach $61.2 billion in 2008, a near 50% increase caused by higher fuel prices.[24] Because of higher fuel prices, many airlines have reduced plans for capacity or Available Seat Miles (ASM) expansion, and thus have cut back on purchases of new aircraft. Therefore, Boeing expects its 2009 and 2010 earnings to slow due to declines in new aircraft demand.[25] However, increases in fuel prices have also led to an increase in demand for Boeing's new fuel-efficient Dreamliner.

Labor Problems Hurt Operations
Boeing has about 154,000 employees in its company, of whom about 37% (almost 60,000) are unionized in various forms. If Boeing does not meet contracted union specifications about certain employee wages, hours, and working conditions, or if workers decide to raise demands, then massive strikes could result, creating serious problems for Boeing in the future, as it has in the past. This situation has come to a head as nearly 27,000 machinists voted on Boeing's proposed contract on September 3rd. Boeing is offering the unionized group additional increases of 2-2.5% over the next three years (the union was seeking 9-13%).[26] After two days of emergency sessions, no agreement was reached and the machinists went on strike. This has caused an immediate halt to all production of the 737, 747, 767 and 777. [27] This strike has caused additional delays in the 787 Dreamliner project. Boeing announced on September 30 that they will be delaying delivery to All Nippon Airways and Japan Airlines Corp by 14 and 15 months, respectively. [28]

After nearly 57 days off of the job, union leaders reached an agreement with Boeing on November 1, 2008.[3] The new contract protects more than 5,000 factory jobs and ensures that employees will not contribute any additional capital towards their health care plans, while promising pay raises of 15% over the next four years.[3] This number is even greater than the 9-13% union leaders had been seeking. As a result of the settlement, Boeing agreed to produce more of its next model of the 787 in-house.[14] This contract ends a strike that was costing Boeing nearly $100 million in revenues per day.[3] As the global economy slows and airline industry profits evaporate, it is yet to be seen how strong Boeing's order book truly is and how much new business the company will be able to attract. The increased labor costs may put a significant strain on future profitability. Immediately following this settlement, negotiations began with 20,300 unionized engineers whose contract ended on December 1st.[29] In a positive development for Boeing, the Society of Professional Engineering Employees in Aerospace voted to accept Boeing's offer. Similar to the machinists, this agreement is for four years rather than the standard three and will give Boeing a clearer picture of its labor costs going forward. The engineers were able to secure annual pay increases of 5%, higher pension benefits, increased overtime wages, and "more input" regarding outsourcing decisions
 
Last edited:
Top