PDA

View Full Version : Is Sanjay Dutt's sentence a setback for the entertainment industry?




melroy88
August 1st, 2007, 02:12 PM
Is Sanjay Dutt's sentence a setback for the entertainment industry?
What do you feel people?




hemant.k008
August 1st, 2007, 04:19 PM
Sanjay Dutt is Just an Entertainer. His Absence will not affect Bollywood a all. Yes ,Some directors who have signed him may face some loss.
Here, if not Sanjay Dutt, there r man other Production waiting for release.. So the SHOW MUST GO ON. May b now we may not see him in movies if he is ordered to 6 yar sentence by SC.

deepakraam
August 1st, 2007, 06:22 PM
Absolutely not.First point is that justice has been given to one of the high profile peoples in India and secondly,all are equal before the eyes of law.Even more,Entertainment industry is nt solely dependant on Sanjay Dutt.Moreover,Sanjay Dutt can still act after 6 yrs.So this is moreover like a break for him rather than an end of his career.


-Deepak.

pt11
August 1st, 2007, 07:09 PM
well,it feels very bad for munnabhai but ithink law must be applicable to all the citizen

projectsrmade2share
August 1st, 2007, 10:01 PM
ya its mattter of 100corers

rahul_parab2006
August 1st, 2007, 10:27 PM
I'ts good to see that the law is similar to all........... even if one is a good top celebrity..........

Atlast Sanjay Dutt got imprisonment .........

He deserves it for wht he did 14 yrs ago............. sensible decision by Judge !!!

moreover, it's good that govt. has rejected its probation plea for getting bail..........

If u talk abt bollywood industry, there is so much talent there like Big B, Aamir, etc. and nothing matters if one actor like munnabhai is not there for 6 years..............as a actor, Snajay Dutt shud continue aftr 6 years.......... obviously some loss will be there for producers who invested their amount in Snajay Dutt for coming films..........

HATS OFF TO ADV. UJJWAL NIKAM !!!

jjmahida
August 2nd, 2007, 02:59 AM
No, the sentence is not a setback for the entertainment industry. But is surely a warning to all the celebrity that how strong would be the image, there is no bar from crime in indian justice. Great work done by our judicial system.

There could be some loss for the forthcoming releases, but no worries as the industry as never stopped at any landmark. It is on the move for growth and is going to grow in a more pace with this economic beneficial conditions.

meghu_kulkarni
August 2nd, 2007, 11:04 AM
hi friends


i am very happy that sunjay dutt got punished . beacause i think more than a filmy hero our society needs real hero like - adv Ujjwal nikam .
Ans as such absence of sanjay dutt will not affect the film industry at all.on the other hand if court were to accept his probation plea for getting bail then it would have given wrong message to the society

hats off to adv ujjwal nikam

-meghana

ssgai24
August 2nd, 2007, 12:06 PM
yes, it is as crores were behind him n also he had already spent a considerable time in jail before, i think court was a bit harsh on him n also w will b missing our munna bhai for sumtime now

gaurav bhatia
August 2nd, 2007, 12:35 PM
i think wat ever the decision is made by court it was correct.by giving this kind of a decision the court has set an eg. before the public tht no one is superior before the law.i also have some of affection with baba but baba has b'com eg. for every one. if any one want to comment on my reply then plz most welcome.

laik08@yahoo.com
August 2nd, 2007, 05:40 PM
ya he i think he realise his mistek

bbokadia
August 2nd, 2007, 07:05 PM
Hi, Friend

I am bhavesh, and about the sanjay dutt's case i think the judement was fair, coz one person who just took AK56 from the car and droped at sanjay's home and u know he got lifetime impressionment.

So, sanjay only got 6 yrs impressionment, so i think that is fair enough, coz its not allowed to keep ak56 rifle at home,

And we all know that he is a good person, and even the judge of the court said that.
Thats it...

akansha_khare
August 2nd, 2007, 08:04 PM
oh cmon.... remorse isnt taken as a reason to let go any person....
d judicial system shudnt let him go jus coz he is famous.....
neither shud he b penalised more coz they wanna boast abt d judicial system...
he shud b treated lik any other person wid a AK56 rifle at home widout license....

ashishsagrawal
August 2nd, 2007, 08:16 PM
According to my perspective the decision made was very correct it is alarm for big personalities that they will not be spared for any crime they do because indian judicial system is same for all people .....

mox
August 3rd, 2007, 01:14 AM
now he is been shifted to pune jail...

prachee
August 3rd, 2007, 09:43 AM
YES IT IS BUT LAW IS SAME FOR EVERYONE

vips_03
August 3rd, 2007, 09:51 AM
Absolutely not.First point is that justice has been given to one of the high profile peoples in India and secondly,all are equal before the eyes of law.Even more,Entertainment industry is nt solely dependant on Sanjay Dutt.Moreover,Sanjay Dutt can still act after 6 yrs.So this is moreover like a break for him rather than an end of his career.


-Deepak.
Actually this is a good precedent for "Celebrities" who take law in hands. But this judegment looks a bit harsh on him. I think he will soon be out because of his "good behaviour"

roshcrazy
August 3rd, 2007, 10:30 PM
I think Sanjay Dutt has been made a scapegoat for nuthing. Its not that on seeing him convicted for 6 years, every single person in India possessing an AK-56 or any other ammunition will stop doing so. He is not the only one who had illegal weapons. Most of the politicans' families have illegal ammunition, police knows it, but cant do anything about them. Even if someone thinks of turning it in, police will take him to task for 'possessing a weapon'. If, like Sanjay Dutt, he tries to dispose it off & police finds out about it, he'll be charged with not only 'possession' but also with 'destruction of evidence'.

Sentencing Sanjay doesnt mean that others wouldn't be charged for weapons, they still will be, how do u think it is possible for people to step forward and surrender?

I think they have just sentenced Sanjay to prove a point to the world that all r equal in front of Indian law. But in doing so they have actually proved that they treated Sanjay Dutt as a movie star & not a common man, that is why chose him to set an example. Also, Sanjay Dutt couldnt get away with it because he is POPULAR like a cinestar and NOT POWERFUL like politicians & corporates. 'It is POWER that gets you off the hook, not popularity'.

meghu_kulkarni
August 4th, 2007, 09:09 PM
i completely agree with u Gaurav
some people are think court was harsh to sanjay dutt but what about those innocent people who were killed in the bomblast ? and what about those people who lost their relatives? what was their mistake? i think we should first think about them .
hence the decision made by court was 100% correct
-meghana

rnp15
August 5th, 2007, 12:08 PM
i dont think so as what ever he is facing is purely consequences of his action
& film industry as whole is not affected by decision.
its just his family , frnds n the people with who he was working (current Projects) are affected by this Actions

yogesh gupta
August 5th, 2007, 06:53 PM
YES IT WILL BE A SETBACK...
BUT IN LAW EYES EVERYONE IS SAME.....

Harryman
August 6th, 2007, 04:07 PM
definitely the answer to this trivial has to be sound YES !! He has seriously made a great name for himself and over the past few years has been part of some of the biggest hits bollywood has ever seen .the entertainment industry is definitely going to miss one of its biggest assets .

but having said that he had it coming ,and the judiciary (although was quite slow in making the judgement) has made the right decision and once again proving that from the Indian Law's point of view every individual is the same and it doesn't matter if he is a filmstar or a small local resident !!

vnagda
August 6th, 2007, 07:46 PM
The decision of the court is right, whether the industry gets affected or not. Everyone in equal in the eyes of the law. A decision of this sort is a warning to all and sundry that no one is superior before the law. It is only the affection of the public currently(after a number of image-building movies like the Munnabhai series) that such a question has arisen in their minds.
The court and the judicial system has set an example that no mater how important a celebrity one is...he will be brought to books.

Kudos to Mr. Kode.

bjl_ty
August 6th, 2007, 10:53 PM
NOOOO...LAW IS EQUAL FOR EVERYONE

mani_29rocks
August 7th, 2007, 10:02 PM
OF cource not!!!
he did some serious mistakes n now he has 2 pay for it!!
n as far the industry goes :SugarwareZ-064: its big money bussiness here no 1 stops for ne1

pratikbharti
August 8th, 2007, 02:35 PM
it would be a setback........
but if someone is found guilty then he/she cannot escape from the punishment............

jyotsna suchdev
August 8th, 2007, 10:01 PM
well if he has to bear the punishment so why not other people who use these weapons should be left out. wht i think is that the main culprits are being ignored:SugarwareZ-064:

Bhupesh
August 14th, 2007, 04:25 PM
It will Not effect the Entertainment Industry. He just one of this big Industry

samar
September 7th, 2007, 04:26 PM
NO.

Nobody is indispensible.

kukrejanilesh
June 14th, 2008, 02:21 AM
lots of money riding on him...economically and fan wise also its a loss only